Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Latest content
    • Latest content
  • Archive
  • About the journal
    • About the journal
    • Editorial board
    • Information for authors
    • FAQs
    • Thank you to our reviewers
    • The American Association for the Surgery of Trauma
  • Submit a paper
    • Online submission site
    • Information for authors
  • Email alerts
    • Email alerts
  • Help
    • Contact us
    • Feedback form
    • Reprints
    • Permissions
    • Advertising
  • BMJ Journals

User menu

  • Login

Search

  • Advanced search
  • BMJ Journals
  • Login
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
TSACO

Advanced Search

  • Latest content
    • Latest content
  • Archive
  • About the journal
    • About the journal
    • Editorial board
    • Information for authors
    • FAQs
    • Thank you to our reviewers
    • The American Association for the Surgery of Trauma
  • Submit a paper
    • Online submission site
    • Information for authors
  • Email alerts
    • Email alerts
  • Help
    • Contact us
    • Feedback form
    • Reprints
    • Permissions
    • Advertising
Open Access

Impact of a streamlined trauma management approach and determinants of mortality among hemodynamically unstable patients with severe multiple injuries: a before-and-after retrospective cohort study

Hiroyuki Otsuka, Atsushi Uehata, Naoki Sakoda, Toshiki Sato, Keiji Sakurai, Hiromichi Aoki, Takeshi Yamagiwa, Shinichi Iizuka, Sadaki Inokuchi
DOI: 10.1136/tsaco-2020-000534 Published 25 September 2020
Hiroyuki Otsuka
Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Tokai University School of Medicine, Kanagawa, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Hiroyuki Otsuka
Atsushi Uehata
Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Tokai University School of Medicine, Kanagawa, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Naoki Sakoda
Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Tokai University School of Medicine, Kanagawa, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Toshiki Sato
Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Tokai University School of Medicine, Kanagawa, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Keiji Sakurai
Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Tokai University School of Medicine, Kanagawa, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Hiromichi Aoki
Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Tokai University School of Medicine, Kanagawa, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Takeshi Yamagiwa
Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Tokai University School of Medicine, Kanagawa, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Shinichi Iizuka
Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Tokai University School of Medicine, Kanagawa, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sadaki Inokuchi
Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Tokai University School of Medicine, Kanagawa, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Figure 1
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1

    Training curriculum. Emergency physicians were trained in emergency medicine, radiology, general surgery, and cardiovascular surgery. In the emergency department, they were responsible for the initial management, anesthesia, surgery, and endovascular treatment of hemodynamically unstable patients with severe trauma, using the techniques that had been taught during their rotation through the radiology, general surgery, and cardiovascular surgery departments. Moreover, trained emergency physicians (TEPs) have handled hemodynamically stable torso-trauma patients and some hemodynamically unstable non-trauma patients who required surgical or interventional treatment. We evaluated each trainee’s competency based on their management of cases in our emergency department.

  • Figure 2
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 2

    Difference in decision-making and practice for initial management between the original trauma management system and the streamlined trauma management system. EPs, emergency physicians; IR, interventional radiology; REBOA, resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta; TEPs, trained emergency physicians.

  • Figure 3
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 3

    Patient inclusion flowchart and cohort assignment. ISS, Injury Severity Score; SBP, systolic blood pressure.

Tables

  • Figures
  • Table 1

    Patient characteristics according to the date of hospital admission

    CharacteristicAll patients
    (n=125)
    Before cohort
    (n=59)*
    After cohort
    (n=66)†
    P value
    Age (years)54.0 (35.0–70.0)51.0 (35.0–68.0)57.0 (39.3–74.0)0.50
    Male sex (%)84 (66.1)41 (69.5)43 (65.2)0.61
    Mechanism of injury (%)0.21
     Motor vehicle crash59 (47.2)26 (44.1)33 (50.0)
     Fall from a height47 (37.6)20 (33.9)27 (40.9)
     Stabbing14 (11.2)9 (15.3)5 (7.6)
     Compression5 (4.0)4 (6.8)1 (1.5)
    Vital signs at admission
     GCS total score11.0 (5.5–14.0)14.0 (6.0–15.0)10.0 (5.5–14.0)0.49
     GCS <9 (%)56 (44.8)25 (42.4)31 (47.0)0.61
     RR (cycles/min)24.0 (18.0–30.0)26.0 (20.0–32.0)24.0 (18.0–30.0)0.15
     SBP (mm Hg)70.0 (54.0–87.0)70.0 (54.0–80.0)72.0 (55.0–90.0)0.38
     Lowest SBP before PH (mm Hg)50.0 (0–60.0)64.0 (40.0–70.0)48.5 (0.0–60.0)0.003
     BT (°C)36.0 (35.5–36.7)36.0 (35.5–36.5)36.0 (35.4–36.8)0.26
     Pulse rate (beats/min)110.0 (90.0–130.8)118.0 (90.0–135.0)107.0 (90.0–127.5)0.25
    Laboratory evaluations at admission
     pH7.3 (7.1–7.4)7.3 (7.1–7.3)7.3 (7.1–7.4)0.49
     Base excess (mmol/L)−10.7 (−18.0, −5.2)−11.4 (−18.1, −5.9)−9.7 (−17.8, −4.5)0.48
     Lactate (mg/dL)65.0 (36.0–100.0)66.0 (39.8–101.3)65.0 (35.5–99.0)0.32
     D-dimer (μg/mL)43.1 (16.8–99.9)27.0 (11.7–60.2)63.1 (28.8–111.8)0.21
     PT-INR1.2 (1.0–1.4)1.1 (1.0–1.3)1.2 (1.1–1.4)0.01
    Trauma score
     RTS5.6 (3.5–6.6)5.6 (4.1–6.4)5.6 (3.0–6.8)0.77
     ISS43.0 (32.0–57.0)34.0 (27.0–50.0)50.0 (39.3–66.0)<0.001
     TRISS-PS (%)34.8 (5.0–74.7)53.2 (12.9–83.5)23.0 (1.7–64.2)0.005
    • *Admitted between January 2011 and September 2014.

    • †Admitted between October 2014 and January 2019.

    • BT, body temperature; GCS, Glasgow Coma Scale; ISS, Injury Severity Score; PH, primary hemostasis; PT-INR, prothrombin time-international normalized ratio; RR, respiratory rate; RTS, Revised Trauma Score; SBP, systolic blood pressure; TRISS-PS, probability of survival calculated by the Trauma and Injury Severity Score.

  • Table 2

    Patient management and outcomes according to the intervention period

    ParameterAll patients
    (n=125)
    Before cohort
    (n=59)*
    After cohort
    (n=66)†
    P value
    Outcomes (%)
     24 h mortality36 (28.8)23 (39.0)13 (19.7)0.02
     In-hospital mortality62 (49.6)38 (64.4)24 (36.4)0.002
     Mortality owing to exsanguination35 (28.0)23 (39.0)12 (18.2)0.005
     Survivor with TRISS-PS<25%14 (11.2)1 (1.7)13 (19.7)<0.001
    Number of patients who underwent CT before hemostasis85 (68.0)40 (67.8)45 (68.2)0.96
    REBOA (%)20 (16.0)4 (6.8)16 (24.2)0.008
    Time to initiate primary hemostasis (min)55.0 (34.0–82.0)71.5 (53.8–130.8)41.0 (27.0–59.0)<0.001
    Number of patients who underwent IR for primary hemostasis62 (49.6)28 (47.5)34 (51.5)0.65
    Prehemostasis-administered transfusions (mL)
     RBCs560.0 (280.0–1120.0)560.0 (0.0–840.0)560.0 (560.0–1120.0)0.001
     FFP0.0 (0–240.0)0.0 (0–60.0)240.0 (0–480.0)<0.001
     FFP:RBCs0.0 (0.0–0.4)0.0 (0.0–0.0)0.2 (0.0–0.4)<0.001
    Total amount of blood transfusions in the first 24 h (units)
     RBCs16.0 (8.0–25.5)19.0 (6.0–32.5)15.0 (8.0–20.0)0.46
     FFP8.0 (4.0–18.0)12.0 (4.0–20.5)9.0 (6.0–20.0)0.20
     FFP:RBCs0.7 (0.4–1.0)0.6 (0.3–0.7)0.8 (0.5–1.0)<0.001
     Platelet10.0 (0.0–20.0)10.0 (0.0–20.0)0.0 (0.0–20.0)0.59
    Massive transfusion (≥10 units of RBCs within 24 h) (%)86 (68.8)36 (61.0)50 (75.8)0.08
    • *Admitted between January 2011 and September 2014.

    • †Admitted between October 2014 and January 2019.

    • FFP, fresh frozen plasma; IR, interventional radiology; RBCs, red blood cells; REBOA, resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta; TRISS-PS, probability of survival calculated by the Trauma and Injury Severity Score.

  • Table 3

    Primary determinants of in-hospital mortality

    VariableAdjusted OR of survival
    (95% CI)
    P value
    Age (years)0.95 (0.92 to 0.98)0.001
    RTS2.17 (1.46 to 3.21)<0.001
    ISS0.94 (0.90 to 0.98)0.004
    Prehemostasis-RBCs (units)0.78 (0.64 to 0.95)0.01
    Prehemostasis-FFP (units)1.49 (1.04 to 2.14)0.03
    REBOA9.48 (1.25 to 72.0)0.03
    Time to initiation of surgery/IR (min)0.97 (0.96 to 0.99)<0.001
    • FFP, fresh frozen plasma; IR, interventional radiology; ISS, Injury Severity Score; RBCs, red blood cells; REBOA, resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta; RTS, Revised Trauma Score.

PreviousNext
Back to top
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on TSACO.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Impact of a streamlined trauma management approach and determinants of mortality among hemodynamically unstable patients with severe multiple injuries: a before-and-after retrospective cohort study
(Your Name) has sent you a message from TSACO
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the TSACO web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Citation Tools
Impact of a streamlined trauma management approach and determinants of mortality among hemodynamically unstable patients with severe multiple injuries: a before-and-after retrospective cohort study
Hiroyuki Otsuka, Atsushi Uehata, Naoki Sakoda, Toshiki Sato, Keiji Sakurai, Hiromichi Aoki, Takeshi Yamagiwa, Shinichi Iizuka, Sadaki Inokuchi
Trauma Surg Acute Care Open Sep 2020, 5 (1) e000534; DOI: 10.1136/tsaco-2020-000534

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Cite This
  • APA
  • Chicago
  • Endnote
  • MLA
Loading
Impact of a streamlined trauma management approach and determinants of mortality among hemodynamically unstable patients with severe multiple injuries: a before-and-after retrospective cohort study
Hiroyuki Otsuka, Atsushi Uehata, Naoki Sakoda, Toshiki Sato, Keiji Sakurai, Hiromichi Aoki, Takeshi Yamagiwa, Shinichi Iizuka, Sadaki Inokuchi
Trauma Surg Acute Care Open Sep 2020, 5 (1) e000534; DOI: 10.1136/tsaco-2020-000534
Download PDF

Share
Impact of a streamlined trauma management approach and determinants of mortality among hemodynamically unstable patients with severe multiple injuries: a before-and-after retrospective cohort study
Hiroyuki Otsuka, Atsushi Uehata, Naoki Sakoda, Toshiki Sato, Keiji Sakurai, Hiromichi Aoki, Takeshi Yamagiwa, Shinichi Iizuka, Sadaki Inokuchi
Trauma Surgery & Acute Care Open Sep 2020, 5 (1) e000534; DOI: 10.1136/tsaco-2020-000534
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
Respond to this article
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • Building trauma capability: using geospatial analysis to consider military treatment facilities for trauma center development
  • A decade of hospital costs for firearm injuries in the United States by region, 2005–2015: government healthcare costs and firearm policies
  • Variability in opioid pain medication prescribing for adolescent trauma patients in a sample of US pediatric trauma centers
Show more Original research

Similar Articles

 
 

CONTENT

  • Latest content
  • Archive
  • eLetters
  • Sign up for email alerts
  • RSS

JOURNAL

  • About the journal
  • Editorial board
  • Thank you to our reviewers
  • The American Association for the Surgery of Trauma

AUTHORS

  • Information for authors
  • Submit a paper
  • Track your article
  • Open Access at BMJ

HELP

  • Contact us
  • Reprints
  • Permissions
  • Advertising
  • Feedback form

©Copyright 2022 The American Association for the Surgery of Trauma