RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Patient-reported outcomes in trauma: a scoping study of published research
JF Trauma Surgery & Acute Care Open
FD BMJ Publishing Group Ltd
SP e000202
DO 10.1136/tsaco-2018-000202
VO 3
IS 1
A1 Graeme M Rosenberg
A1 Christopher Stave
A1 David A Spain
A1 Thomas G Weiser
YR 2018
UL http://tsaco.bmj.com/content/3/1/e000202.abstract
AB More people are surviving traumatic injury, but disability and reduced quality of life are frequent. Investigators are now focusing on patient-reported outcomes (PROs) to better understand this problem. We performed a scoping study of the literature to explore trends in the study of PROs after injury. The volume of published literature on PROs after injury has consistently increased, but use of measurement tool and categorization of publications are inconsistent. Journal keyword patterns are inconsistent and likely limit the effective dissemination of important findings. In studies of hospitalized trauma patients, more than 100 unique measurement tools were used, and trauma-specific measures were used in fewer than 5% of studies. International investigators are more consistent than those in the USAin the use of validated, classic measurement tools such as the Short-Form 36 and the EuroQoL Five-Dimension tools. Uniform use of measurement tools would help improve the quality and comparability of research on PROs, and trauma-specific measures would enhance the study of long-term injury outcomes.