Table 3

Comparison of clinical and procedure factors and outcomes between non-target zone placement and target zone placement.

Non-target zone placement
(n=11)
Target zone placement
(n=27)
P value
Patient characteristics
 Sex (male), n (%)10 (90.9)17 (63.0)0.124
 Age (years) ≥65, n (%)0 (0)5 (18.5)0.295
Blunt mechanism, n (%)11 (100)24 (88.9)0.542
 SBP <80, n (%)7 (63.6)14 (51.9)0.721
 GCS 3–8, n (%)6 (54.5)15 (55.6)1.000
 ISS ≥40, n (%)6 (54.5)9 (33.3)0.285
 DOA, n (%)2 (18.2)4 (14.8)1.000
Major bleeding source
 Chest, n (%)1 (9.1)2 (7.4)0.097
 Abdominal, n (%)2 (18.2)15 (55.6)
 Pelvis, n (%)7 (63.6)7 (25.9)
 Others, n (%)1 (9.1)3 (11.1)
Technical characteristics
 Femoral approach side (right), n (%)6 (54.5)23 (85.2)0.088
Operator specialty*
 Surgeon, n (%)7 (63.0)17 (63.6)1.000
 Radiologist, n (%)4 (37.0)10 (36.4)
Operator seniority
 Resident (PGY 3–5), n (%)1 (9.1)4 (14.8)0.241
 Junior faculty (PGY 6–10), n (%)1 (9.1)9 (33.3)
 Senior faculty (PGY 11–), n (%)9 (81.8)14 (51.9)
 Switch from resuscitative thoracotomy, n (%)1 (9.1)8 (29.6)0.237
REBOA catheter size
 10 Fr sheath, n (%)8 (72.7)15 (55.6))0.160
 7 Fr sheath, n (%)3 (27.3)12 (44.4))
Clinical outcomes
 REBOA-related complications, n (%)0 (0)2 (7.4)0.542
 24-hour mortality, n (%)4 (36.4)15 (55.6)0.476
 In-hospital mortality, n (%)4 (36.4)18 (66.7)0.147
  • Categorical variables are presented as number (%).

  • *Seven surgeons and four radiologists performed REBOA procedures.

  • †One resident, five junior faculties, and nine senior faculties performed REBOA procedures. Postgraduate year was recorded when each operator performed the procedure as this was a long-term study.

  • DOA, dead on arrival; GCS, Glasgow Coma Scale; ISS, injury severity score; REBOA, resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta; SBP, systolic blood pressure.