Table 4

Patient characteristics with isolated femoral and popliteal arterial injuries by repair technique (n=131)

Endovascular repair
(n=30)
Open repair
(n=18)
Hybrid repair
(n=34)
No intervention*(n=49)P value†
2 groups
P value‡
3 groups
Age, median (Q1, Q3)24 (21, 31)28 (21, 37)24.5 (21, 34)30 (24, 39)0.26630.5033
Gender, n (%)0.28240.3623
 Male26 (86.7)18 (100)31 (91.2)47 (95.9)
 Female4 (13.3)0 (0)3 (8.8)2 (4.1)
Race, n (%) (n=116)(n=27)(n=31)(n=40)0.18830.4000
 White6 (22.2)8 (44.4)6 (19.4)7 (17.5)
 Black20 (74.1)10 (55.6)23 (74.2)30 (75.0)
 Asian0 (0.0)0 (0.0)1 (3.2)2 (5.0)
 Other1 (3.7)0 (0.0)1 (3.2)1 (2.5)
ISS, median (Q1, Q3)10.5 (10, 17)17 (9, 24)10 (9, 16)10 (10, 17)0.77980.2582
TRISS, median (Q1, Q3) (n=124)0.99 (0.98, 0.99)0.99 (0.74, 0.99)
(n=16)
0.99 (0.98, 0.99)0.99 (0.96, 0.99)
(n=44)
0.78990.2674
AIS, median (Q1, Q3)3 (3, 3)3.5 (3, 4)3 (3, 3)3 (3, 4)0.28290.3531
SBP, median (Q1, Q3) (n=129)117 (107, 130)108.5 (96, 128)123 (112, 135)118 (90, 140)
(n=47)
0.46880.2590
HR, median (Q1, Q3) (n=130)89.5 (77, 108)95.5 (90, 115)94 (82, 115)98.5 (76.5, 117)
(n=48)
0.18650.3921
GCS, median (Q1, Q3) (n=130)15 (15, 15)15 (4, 15)
(n=17)
15 (15, 15)15 (15, 15)0.06860.1481
Blood unit, median (Q1, Q3)
(n=129)
0 (0, 0)0 (0, 2)0 (0, 1)
(n=33)
0 (0, 1)
(n=48)
0.17850.3661
MTP, n (%) (n=64)1 (5.6)
(n=18)
1 (50)
(n=2)
0 (0)
(n=1)
7 (16.3)
(n=43)
0.19470.2714
ICU LOS, median (Q1, Q3)1 (0, 3)2 (2, 5)2 (1, 4)1 (0, 1)0.01850.0403
Step-down LOS,
median (Q1, Q3)
0 (0, 2)0 (0, 0)0 (0, 0)0 (0, 0)0.04420.0985
Ventilator days,
median (Q1, Q3)
0 (0, 0)1 (0, 3)0 (0, 1)0 (0, 0)0.00200.0053
Hospital LOS,
median (Q1, Q3)
6 (4, 11)11.5 (5, 20)12 (8, 16)4 (3, 9)0.10260.0150
  • *The no intervention group was not included in any of the significance testing.

  • †P values were used to examine differences between the open and endovascular repair groups, and were based on non-parametric Wilcoxon rank-sum tests or parametric two-sample t-tests for continuous variables and Fisher’s exact tests for categorical variables.

  • ‡P values were used to examine differences between all three repair groups (endovascular, open, hybrid), and were based on non-parametric Kruskal-Wallis tests or parametric analysis of variance (ANOVA) tests for continuous variables and Fisher’s exact tests for categorical variables.

  • AIS, Abbreviated Injury Scale; GCS, Glasgow Coma Scale; HR, heart rate; ICU, intensive care unit; ISS, Injury Severity Score; LOS, length of stay; MTP, massive transfusion protocol; SBP, systolic blood pressure; TRISS, Trauma and Injury Severity Score.