Regular Article
Factors Associated with Mortality in Patients with Penetrating Abdominal Vascular Trauma

https://doi.org/10.1006/jsre.2002.6543Get rights and content

Abstract

Objective. Prehospital transport, resuscitation, and operative intervention are all critical to the care of the penetrating trauma victim. We determined which factors most affected mortality in patients with penetrating abdominal vascular injuries.

Methods. Consecutive patients with penetrating abdominal vascular injuries from an urban Level I trauma center from January 1993 to December 1998 were identified from the trauma registry and their charts reviewed. All patients who died prior to operative intervention were excluded. Data collected included mortality, age, scene time (ST), EMS transport time (TT), time in the emergency department (ED), initial systolic blood pressure in the ED (BP), operating time, intraoperative estimated blood loss (EBL), and worst base deficit in the first 24 h (BD). These variables were compared between nonsurvivors and survivors by univariate ANOVA. Multivariate ANOVA (MANOVA) determined independent effects on mortality.

Results. Forty-six penetrating abdominal vascular injuries were identified in 31 patients, 11 of whom died (38.7%). Examining prehospital parameters, mean ST averaged 16.5 ± 3.6 min, while TT was 31.8 ± 7.1 min. For ED parameters, initial BP was 94.8 ± 6.4 mm Hg and initial heart rate was 109 ± 7 beats per minute. Mean operative EBL for all patients was 3518 ± 433 ml. The mean BD for all patients was −12.9 ± 1.8. Significant differences were noted in the univariate analysis between survivors and nonsurvivors for BD (P < 0.0001), BP (P = 0.0062) and EBL (P = 0.0002). MANOVA revealed that only base deficit (P < 0.0001) had an independent effect on mortality.

Conclusions. In patients with penetrating abdominal vascular injuries who survive their ED stay, adverse physiologic parameters reflecting the adequacy of resuscitation are more predictive of mortality than identifiable prehospital parameters.

References (26)

  • W.I. Biffl et al.

    Management of abdominal vascular injuries

    Semin. Vasc. Surg.

    (1998)
  • R.R. Martin et al.

    Prospective evaluation of preoperative fluid resuscitation in hypotensive patients with penetrating truncal injury A preliminary report

    J. Trauma

    (1992)
  • Cited by (41)

    • High Mortality and Venous Thromboembolism Risk Following Major Penetrating Abdominal Venous Injuries

      2021, Annals of Vascular Surgery
      Citation Excerpt :

      However, these numbers are significantly higher than the rate of VTE following non-operative management (5.1%), suggesting that operative intervention for iliocaval injury increases VTE risk. Operative repair or ligation of vascular injuries has been shown to independently predict DVT,17 as has major venous repair.22 These results may be explained by intimal damage from direct vessel injury, venous stasis, and immobility following major operative intervention.22,23

    • Abdominal vascular injuries: Blunt vs. penetrating

      2019, Injury
      Citation Excerpt :

      The higher ISS and NISS in the blunt group could be explained by higher numbers of associated injuries seen in blunt trauma, particularly head injuries and pelvic fractures. Majority (78%) of the patients in the present study were in shock, which was also commonly noticed in other AVI studies (44–76%) [1,4–6,8,10,12]. The most commonly injured vessel in the present study was IVC (33%, Table 3), which corresponds with several previous studies (IVC injury rates 25–41%) [1,4,6,8,10].

    • The influence of prehospital time on trauma patients outcome: A systematic review

      2015, Injury
      Citation Excerpt :

      Three studies report on patients suffering penetrating trauma. Eachempati et al. [25] and McCoy et al. [27] show no increased odds of mortality for longer TT. However, Swaroop et al. [24] show significantly shorter TT for hypotensive patients versus normotensive patients.

    View all citing articles on Scopus

    Presented at the Eastern Association of the Surgery of Trauma, Sanibel Harbour, Florida, January 2000.

    View full text