Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Interpreting the Empirical Evidence on Illegal Gun Market Dynamics

  • Published:
Journal of Urban Health Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Thousands of Americans are killed by gunfire each year, and hundreds of thousands more are injured or threatened with guns in robberies and assaults. The burden of gun violence in urban areas is particularly high. Critics suggest that the results of firearm trace data and gun trafficking investigation studies cannot be used to understand the illegal supply of guns to criminals and, therefore, that regulatory and enforcement efforts designed to disrupt illegal firearms markets are futile in addressing criminal access to firearms. In this paper, we present new data to address three key arguments used by skeptics to undermine research on illegal gun market dynamics. We find that criminals rely upon a diverse set of illegal diversion pathways to acquire guns, gun traffickers usually divert small numbers of guns, newer guns are diverted through close-to-retail diversions from legal firearms commerce, and that a diverse set of gun trafficking indicators are needed to identify and shut down gun trafficking pathways.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

FIGURE 1.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. US Federal Bureau of Investigation. Crime in the United States, 2009. Available at http://www2.fbi.gov/ucr/cius2009. Accessed March 18, 2011.

  2. Truman JL, Rand MR. Criminal victimization, 2009. Washington: Bureau of Justice Statistics; 2010. NCJ231327.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Reiss AJ, Roth J. Understanding and preventing violence. Washington: National Academy Press; 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Kennedy DM, Piehl AM, Braga AA. Youth violence in Boston: gun markets, serious youth offenders, and a use-reduction strategy. Law & Contemp Probl. 1996; 59: 147–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Braga AA. Serious youth gun offenders and the epidemic of youth violence in Boston. J Quant Criminology. 2003; 19: 33–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Braga AA, Hureau DM, Winship C. Losing faith? Police, black churches, and the resurgence of youth violence in Boston. Ohio St J Crim Law. 2008; 6: 141–172.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Cook PJ, Ludwig J, Braga AA. The criminal records of homicide offenders. JAMA. 2005; 294: 598–601.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Cook PJ, Braga AA, Moore MH. Gun control. In: Wilson JQ, Petersilia J, eds. Crime and public policy. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 2011: 257–292.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Wintemute GJ, Wright MA, Drake CM, Beaumont JJ. Subsequent criminal activity among violent misdemeanants who seek to purchase handguns: risk factors and effectiveness of denying handgun purchase. JAMA. 2001; 285: 1019–1026.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Wright MA, Wintemute GJ, Rivara F. Effectiveness of a program to deny legal handgun purchase to persons believed to be at high risk for firearm violence. Am J Public Health. 1999; 89: 88–90.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Cook PJ, Braga AA. Comprehensive firearms tracing: strategic and investigative uses of new data on firearms markets. Arizona Law Rev. 2001; 43: 277–309.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Braga AA, Cook PJ, Kennedy DM, Moore MH. The illegal supply of firearms. In: Tonry M, ed. Crime and justice: a review of research, vol. 29. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 2002: 229–262.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Pierce GL, Braga AA, Hyatt RR, Koper CS. The characteristics and dynamics of illegal firearms markets: implications for a supply-side enforcement strategy. Justice Q. 2004; 21: 391–422.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Braga AA, Pierce GL. Disrupting illegal firearms markets in Boston: the effects of operation ceasefire on the supply of new handguns to criminals. Criminol Publ Pol. 2005; 4: 717–748.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Koper CS. Purchase of multiple firearms as a risk factor for criminal gun use. Criminol Publ Pol. 2005; 4: 749–778.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms (ATF). Crime gun trace analysis reports (1997): the illegal firearms market in 17 communities. Washington: Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms; 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms (ATF). Following the gun: enforcing federal laws against firearms traffickers. Washington: Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms; 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms (ATF). Crime gun trace analysis (2000): national report. Washington: Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms; 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Moore MH. Keeping handguns from criminal offenders. Annals. 1981; 452: 22–32.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Zimring FE. Street crime and new guns: some implications for firearms control. J Crim Justice. 1976; 4: 95–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Wachtel J. Sources of crime guns in Los Angeles, California. Policing. 1998; 21: 220–239.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Wintemute GJ, Romero MP, Wright MA, Grassel KM. The life cycle of crime guns: a description based on guns recovered from young people in California. Ann Emerg Med. 2004; 43: 733–742.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Wellford C, Pepper JV, Petrie CV, eds. Firearms and violence: a critical review. Washington: The National Academies Press; 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Wintemute GJ. Risk factors among handgun retailers for frequent and disproportionate sales of guns used in violent and firearm related crimes. Inj Prev. 2005; 11: 357–363.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Sorenson SB, Vittes KA. Buying a handgun for someone else: firearm retailer willingness to sell. Inj Prev. 2003; 9: 147–150.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Wintemute GJ. Firearm retailers’ willingness to participate in an illegal gun purchase. J Urban Health. 2010; 87: 865–878.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. National Rifle Association. Firearm traces: The anti-gunners’ big lie. Available at: http://www.nraila.org/Issues/Articles/Read.aspx?id=12&issue=014. Accessed January 2, 2010.

  28. Blackman PH. The limitations of BATF firearms tracing data for policymaking and homicide research. In: Proceedings of the Homicide Research Working Group meetings, 1997 and 1998. Washington: National Institute of Justice, US Department of Justice; 1999: 58–113.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Kleck G. BATF gun trace data and the role of organized gun trafficking in supplying guns to criminals. St Louis Univ Publ Law Rev. 1999; 18: 23–45.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Kleck G, Wang S-YK. The myth of big-time gun trafficking and the overinterpretation of gun tracing data. UCLA Law Rev. 2009; 56: 1233–1294.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Pirie M. How to win every argument: the use and abuse of logic. UK: Continuum International Publishing Group; 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Cook PJ, Molloconi S, Cole T. Regulating gun markets. J Crim Law Criminol. 1995; 86: 59–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. US Department of the Treasury and U.S. Department of Justice. Gun shows: Brady checks and crime gun traces. Washington: US Department of the Treasury and US Department of Justice; 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Sheley JF, Wright JD. In the line of fire: youth, guns, and violence in urban America. New York: Aldine de Gruyter; 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Wright JD, Rossi PH. Armed and considered dangerous. 2nd ed. New York: Aldine de Gruyter; 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  36. US Bureau of Justice Statistics (BJS). Survey of state prison inmates, 1991. Washington: Bureau of Justice Statistics, US Department of Justice; 1993. NCJ 136949.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Webster DW, Freed LH, Frattaroli S, Wilson MH. How delinquent youth acquire guns: initial versus most recent gun acquisitions. J Urban Health. 2002; 79: 60–69.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Cook PJ, Ludwig J. Guns in America: results of a comprehensive national survey on firearms ownership and use. Washington: Police Foundation; 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms (ATF). Crime gun trace analysis (1999): national report. Washington: Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms; 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Webster DW, Zeoli AM, Bulzacchelli MT, Vernick JS. Effects of police stings of gun dealers on the supply of new guns to criminals. Inj Prev. 2006; 12: 225–230.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Webster DW, Vernick JS, Bulzacchelli MT. Effects of a gun dealer’s change in sales practices on the supply of guns to criminals. J Urban Health. 2006; 83: 778–787.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms (ATF). Commerce in firearms in the United States. Washington: US Department of the Treasury; 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Pierce GL, Braga AA, Koper CS, et al. The characteristics and dynamics of gun markets: report submitted to the US National Institute of Justice. Boston: Northeastern University; 2003.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anthony A. Braga.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Braga, A.A., Wintemute, G.J., Pierce, G.L. et al. Interpreting the Empirical Evidence on Illegal Gun Market Dynamics. J Urban Health 89, 779–793 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11524-012-9681-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11524-012-9681-y

Keywords

Navigation