Scientific paper
Gunshot wounds of the colon: A review of 100 consecutive patients, with emphasis on complications and their causes

https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9610(76)90100-8Get rights and content

Abstract

The cases of one hundred civilian patients with gunshot wounds of the colon treated at the Louisville General Hospital have been reviewed. Most injuries were in the transverse colon (44 per cent), followed by the ascending colon (27 per cent), rectosigmoid (19 per cent), and descending colon (10 per cent). Associated injuries occurred in 81 per cent of the patients; the small bowel was the most common structure injured.

Primary closure was used in 52 per cent of the patients, with a resultant 19 per cent rate of wound infection and 14 per cent rate of serious complication. When the extent of contamination or tissue destruction required resection, an attempted primary anastomosis was followed by a high rate of wound infection (57 per cent) and serious complications (36 per cent) as compared with end-colostomy and mucous fistula, which resulted in a 24 per cent rate of wound infection and 24 per cent rate of serious complication. The rate of wound infection between these groups is significant (p = 0.05). Results with end-colostomy and mucous fistula were better than with attempted primary anastomosis.

Primary closure of missile injuries of the colon is feasible but should not be attempted in the presence of gross fecal peritonitis or massive tissue destruction. If resection is undertaken, end-colostomy (or ileostomy) and distal mucous fistula should be performed in the presence of intra-abdominal contamination to reduce the incidence of postoperative wound infection and serious complications. Delayed primary closure should also reduce the rate of wound infection in these patients.

References (16)

  • EP Quarantillo et al.

    Survey of cecal and ascending colon injuries among Vietnam casualties in Japan (1967–1970)

    Am J Surg

    (1973)
  • Abrams BL, Alsikafi F, Waterman NG: Colostomy—a serious operation. Submitted for...
  • JS Aldrete et al.

    Reconstructive surgery of the colon in soldiers injured in Vietnam

    Ann Surg

    (1970)
  • MI Ganchrow et al.

    Surgical management of traumatic injuries of the colon and rectum

    Arch Surg

    (1970)
  • F Ruiz-Mareno et al.

    Traumatic injuries to the colon

    Dis Colon Rectum

    (1971)
  • AC Beall et al.

    Surgical considerations in the management of civilian colon injuries

    Ann Surg

    (1971)
  • AS Josen et al.

    Primary closure of civilian colorectal wounds

    Ann Surg

    (1972)
  • C McGown et al.

    Colon injuries in civilian practice

    Am Surg

    (1972)
There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (30)

  • Abdominal gunshot wounds - A comparative assessment of severity measures

    2015, Journal of Surgical Research
    Citation Excerpt :

    Worldwide, homicidal gunshot injuries occur at a rate of 0.2–4.8 per 100,000 patient population [6], with mortality rates approaching 88% [5]. Improvements in trauma systems in high-income countries such as the United States have resulted in a significant improvement in survival from penetrating abdominal trauma (including gunshot wounds) [7–9]. For low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), where the burden of gunshot injuries is vast [10–12], there remains a need to establish evidence-based severity measures predictive of complications and mortality to facilitate development of enhanced trauma reporting and care.

  • Applicability of an established management algorithm for destructive colon injuries after abbreviated laparotomy: A 17-year experience

    2014, Journal of the American College of Surgeons
    Citation Excerpt :

    Mortality rates fell to 22% to 35% during World War II with the development of mandatory fecal diversion, along with improvements in triage, resuscitation, and antibiotics.19-23 Diversion of all colon injuries became the standard of care until the late 1970s, when surgeons realized those civilian wounds were different from those of their military counterparts, allowing for a more aggressive use of primary repair for less destructive injuries.24-34 Over the last 3 decades, several evidence-based reports have identified risk factors for suture line failure after resection and anastomosis of destructive colon injuries, demonstrating low morbidity despite a more judicious use of diversion.14-17,35,36

  • Colon trauma: Further support for primary repair

    1988, The American Journal of Surgery
View all citing articles on Scopus

Present address: 1124 Doctors Drive, Tyler, Texas 75701.

1

From the Department of Surgery, University of Louisville School of Medicine, Health Sciences Center, Louisville, Kentucky.

View full text