Management of selected rectal injuries by primary repair**

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0002-9610(96)00244-9Get rights and content

Background

Diversion of the fecal stream with or without primary repair has been the mainstay of therapy for rectal injuries. Because primary repair has replaced colostomy as the treatment of choice for most colon injuries, we reviewed our experience with primary repair of rectal injuries in order to determine if primary repair without diversion is a feasible option in selected patients.

Materials and Methods

All traumatic rectal injuries over the past 48 months were reviewed for mechanism of injury, diagnosis, treatment, and outcome.

Results

Thirty consecutive patients with extra-peritoneal rectal injuries were identified. Six of the 30 patients underwent primary repair without diversion. Five were repaired transanally, and 1 was repaired at celiotomy. There was no morbidity related to the rectal repair in patients who underwent primary repair without diversion, and there were no deaths.

Conclusions

Based on a small number of patients, these data suggest that primary repair of rectal injuries in selected patients may be feasible. Further prospective investigation is needed to determine which patients may be successfully treated in this fashion.

References (25)

  • TuggleD et al.

    Management of rectal trauma

    Am J Surg

    (1984)
  • PachterH et al.

    The morbidity and financial impact of colostomy closure in trauma patients

    J Trauma

    (1990)
  • BurchJM et al.

    The injured colon

    Ann Surg

    (1986)
  • ShannonFL et al.

    Primary repair of the colon: when is it a safe alternative?

    Surgery

    (1985)
  • SchultzSC et al.

    Identifying the low-risk patient with penetrating colonic injury for selective use of primary repair

    Surg Gynecol Obstet

    (1993)
  • ChappuisCW et al.

    Management of pen-etrating colon injuries

    Ann Surg

    (1991)
  • DemetriadesD et al.

    Gunshot wounds of the colon: role of primary repair

    Ann Roy Coll Surg Engl

    (1992)
  • StoneHH et al.

    Management of perforating colon trauma

    Ann Surg

    (1979)
  • BurchJM et al.

    Colostomy and drainage for civilian rectal injuries: is that all?

    Ann Surg

    (1989)
  • TrunkeyD et al.

    Management of rectal trauma

    J Trauma

    (1973)
  • HaasPA et al.

    Civilian injuries of the rectum and anus

    Dis Colon Rect

    (1979)
  • ThomasD et al.

    Management of rectal injuries—dogma versus practice

    Am Surg

    (1990)
  • Cited by (73)

    • Iatrogenic bowel injury (early vs delayed)

      2019, Seminars in Colon and Rectal Surgery
      Citation Excerpt :

      Patients with rectal injuries which result in rectocutaneous fistulas after perineal prostatectomies may be treated successfully with antibiotics and supportive care.58 The data supporting this management strategy is a small volume case series, but is supported by trauma literature which advocates conservative treatment of rectal injuries below the peritoneal reflection.67,68 Fistulas that are refractory to traditional management in otherwise stable patients may benefit from fibrin glue injection, or stent placement, but studies supporting this therapy are small and retrospective in nature.69,70

    • Emergent Care of the Victim of Colorectal Trauma

      2019, Shackelford's Surgery of the Alimentary Tract: 2 Volume Set
    • The management of penetrating rectal and anal trauma: A systematic review

      2017, Injury
      Citation Excerpt :

      If a rectal injury is suspected, a rigid proctoscopy or sigmoidoscopy is mandatory. Proctoscopy is the gold standard in the detection of rectal injuries [25,26] with reported sensitivities near 100% [22,23,25,27]. Plain radiographs may aid diagnosis, but multi-detector computed tomography (CT) sensitive in diagnosing pneumoretroperitoneum and visceral injury [28,29].

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    **

    Presented at the 48th Annual Meeting of the Southwestern Surgical Congress, Scottsdale, Arizona, April 28–May 1, 1996.

    View full text