Elsevier

Injury

Volume 28, Issue 4, May 1997, Pages 261-265
Injury

Paper
The value of physical examination in the diagnosis of patients with blunt abdominal trauma: a retrospective study

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0020-1383(97)00007-7Get rights and content

Abstract

Between 1 January 1993 and 1 January 1994, 204 consecutive patients with possible blunt abdominal injury were analysed retrospectively. All patients underwent a standardized diagnostic approach on admission to the emergency room. Abdominal ultrasound (AUS) was performed in all cases. If there was evidence of intra-abdominal injury on physical examination or AUS, without signs of persistent hypovolaemia after initial assessment, contrastenhanced computed tomographic scanning (CECT) of the abdomen was carried out without exception. Physical examination was equivocal in 13 and 3 per cent, respectively, of patients with ‘isolated’ abdominal trauma (N = 23) or with fractures of lower ribs 7–12 as a sole diagnosis (N = 30). In multiple injury patients (N = 95) or those with suspected ‘isolated’ head injury (N = 56), these figures reached 45 and 84 per cent, respectively. AUS (N = 204) revealed intra-abdominal injury in 20 per cent of patients, and CECT (N = 43) resulted in additional information in 49 per cent. Patients with ‘isolated’ head injury showed 9 per cent abnormalities on abdominal evaluation versus 32 per cent in multiple injury patients. In lower rib fractures (7–12) in multiple injury patients abdominal injury was diagnosed in 67 per cent of the cases. We conclude that: (1) negative findings following reliable physical examination of patients with ‘isolated’ head injury show very high values (NPV 100 per cent), but reliable physical examination is very infrequent (16 per cent); (2) NPV in lower rib fractures due to low energy impact is very high (100 per cent), with a reliable physical examination in most patients (97 per cent); (3) in patients with isolated abdominal trauma 87 per cent have a reliable physical examination with a moderately high NPV (71 per cent); (4) almost half the multiple injury patients have an unequivocal physical examination (45 per cent), with a high NPV following reliable physical examination for abdominal injury (85 per cent); (5) abdominal ultrasonography should be the first step in the radiological assessment of all patients with possible blunt abdominal injury; (6) in multiply injured patients with fractures of their lower ribs (7–12) due to high energy impact the incidence of abdominal injury is very high and CECT might be indicated even in the case of normal AUS findings.

References (20)

  • PJ Bode et al.

    Ultrasound in the diagnosis of injury

    Injury

    (1996)
  • DV Feliciano

    Diagnostic modalities in abdominal trauma

    Surg Clin N Am

    (1991)
  • HC Polk et al.

    Intra-abdominal injuries in polytrauma

    World J Surg

    (1983)
  • PJ Bode et al.

    Abdominal ultrasound as a reliable indicator for conclusive laparotomy in blunt abdominal trauma

    J Trauma

    (1993)
  • HR Champion et al.

    Trauma score

    Crit Care

    (1981)
  • SP Baker et al.

    The injury severity score: a method for describing patients with multiple injuries and evaluating emergency care

    J Trauma

    (1974)
  • WR Olsen et al.

    Abdominal paracentesis and peritoneal lavage in blunt abdominal trauma

    J Trauma

    (1971)
  • MA Röthlin et al.

    Ultrasound in blunt abdominal and thoracic trauma

    J Trauma

    (1993)
  • JJ Davis et al.

    Diagnosis and management of blunt abdominal trauma

    Ann Surg

    (1976)
  • RC Mackersie et al.

    Intra-abdominal injury following blunt trauma

    Arch Surg

    (1989)
There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (152)

  • Management of pancreatic trauma in urban India: A multicenter study

    2022, Annals of Medicine and Surgery
    Citation Excerpt :

    Pancreatic trauma occurs in 0.2–2% of patients with blunt trauma and 1–12% of patients with penetrating trauma [5]. The mortality and morbidity rates range from 9 to 34% and 30–60% respectively [6]. The retroperitoneal location of pancreas partly explains the low incidence of pancreatic trauma in abdominal injuries.

  • Occult Abdominal Trauma

    2021, Emergency Medicine Clinics of North America
  • ACR Appropriateness Criteria <sup>®</sup> Rib Fractures

    2019, Journal of the American College of Radiology
View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text