Trauma/original researchImmediate and Delayed Traumatic Intracranial Hemorrhage in Patients With Head Trauma and Preinjury Warfarin or Clopidogrel Use
Introduction
The use of anticoagulant and antiplatelet medications, specifically warfarin and clopidogrel, is steadily increasing.1, 2, 3 Previous studies suggest that patients receiving either of these medications are at increased risk for traumatic intracranial hemorrhage after blunt head trauma, but the risk in a large, generalizable cohort is unknown.4, 5, 6
The majority of patients with traumatic intracranial hemorrhage are identified on initial cranial computed tomographic (CT) scan. Limited data, however, suggest that patients receiving warfarin are at increased risk for delayed traumatic intracranial hemorrhage (traumatic intracranial hemorrhage diagnosed within 2 weeks of injury after an initially normal cranial CT scan result).7, 8, 9 The concern for delayed traumatic intracranial hemorrhage is highlighted by the not uncommon practice of reversing warfarin anticoagulation in patients with head trauma and a normal cranial CT scan result.10 The potential risk for both immediate and delayed traumatic intracranial hemorrhage has generated guidelines recommending routine cranial CT imaging and hospital admission for neurologic observation in head-injured patients receiving warfarin.11, 12, 13, 14 These recommendations, however, are not informed by rigorous, prospective, multicenter studies identifying the prevalence and incidence of immediate traumatic intracranial hemorrhage and delayed traumatic intracranial hemorrhage in patients receiving warfarin.
The evidence supporting an increased risk of traumatic intracranial hemorrhage in patients receiving clopidogrel is more limited,11 despite this drug being one of the most commonly prescribed worldwide.15 Although small retrospective studies suggest an increased risk of traumatic intracranial hemorrhage and mortality in head trauma patients receiving clopidogrel,6, 16, 17 current guidelines do not explicitly recommend routine CT imaging for these patients after blunt head trauma.11, 12, 13 In addition, the risk of delayed traumatic intracranial hemorrhage in patients receiving clopidogrel is entirely unknown.
Knowledge of the true prevalence and incidence of immediate and delayed traumatic intracranial hemorrhage in patients receiving warfarin or clopidogrel would allow clinicians to make evidence-based decisions about their initial patient evaluation and disposition. Therefore, we assessed the prevalence and incidence of immediate and delayed traumatic intracranial hemorrhage in patients with blunt head trauma who were receiving either warfarin or clopidogrel. Warfarin and clopidogrel cohorts were compared. We hypothesized that the prevalence for immediate traumatic intracranial hemorrhage was similar between patients receiving clopidogrel and those receiving warfarin and that the cumulative incidence of delayed traumatic intracranial hemorrhage in both groups was less than 1%.
Section snippets
Study Design
This was a prospective, observational, multicenter study conducted at 2 trauma centers and 4 community hospitals in Northern California. The study was approved by the institutional review boards at all sites.
Setting and Selection of Participants
Adult (aged ≥18 years) emergency department (ED) patients with blunt head trauma and preinjury warfarin or clopidogrel use (within the previous 7 days) were enrolled. We defined blunt head trauma as any blunt head injury regardless of loss of consciousness or amnesia. We excluded patients
Characteristics of Study Subjects
Between April 2009 and January 2011, 1,101 patients were enrolled (83.3% of all eligible patients) (Figure). Comparison of patients enrolled and those eligible but not enrolled demonstrated similar characteristics (age, sex, medication use, ED cranial CT, and hospital admission) and outcomes (immediate traumatic intracranial hemorrhage, neurosurgical intervention, and inhospital mortality). Reasons for failures of the study screening process were unknown. Thirty-seven patients were excluded (25
Limitations
Our results should be interpreted in the context of several limitations. This was an observational study; thus, CT scans were not obtained for all patients and ethical considerations prevented CT scanning solely for study purposes. Some patients not undergoing CT scan during initial ED visit potentially had an undiagnosed traumatic intracranial hemorrhage, although none was identified in follow-up. Furthermore, some patients with a negative initial CT scan result may have eventually developed
Discussion
Contrary to our hypothesis, the prevalence of immediate traumatic intracranial hemorrhage in patients with clopidogrel was significantly higher compared with those receiving warfarin despite the cohorts' having similar characteristics. Additionally, we determined in a large and generalizable cohort of patients receiving warfarin or clopidogrel that the development of a delayed traumatic intracranial hemorrhage after a negative initial cranial CT scan result is rare and does not warrant routine
References (40)
- et al.
Mild head injury, anticoagulants, and risk of intracranial injury
Lancet
(2001) - et al.
The effects of preinjury clopidogrel use on older trauma patients with head injuries
Am J Surg
(2006) - et al.
Clinical policy: neuroimaging and decisionmaking in adult mild traumatic brain injury in the acute setting
Ann Emerg Med
(2008) - et al.
Underreporting the use of dietary supplements and nonprescription medications among patients undergoing a periodic health examination
Mayo Clin Proc
(1999) - et al.
The Canadian CT Head Rule for patients with minor head injury
Lancet
(2001) - et al.
Pharmacology and management of the vitamin K antagonists: American College of Chest Physicians evidence-based clinical practice guidelines (8th edition)
Chest
(2008) Fifty years of clinical use of warfarin
Invest Clin
(2010)- et al.
Who receives anticoagulant treatment with warfarin and why?a population-based study in Finland
Scand J Prim Heath Care
(2010) - et al.
Why is the use of clopidogrel increasing rapidly in Australia?an exploration of geographical location, age, sex and cardiac stenting rates as possible influences on clopidogrel use
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf
(2008) - et al.
Intracranial complications of preinjury anticoagulation in trauma patients with head injury
J Trauma
(2002)
Traumatic brain injury in anticoagulated patients
J Trauma
Delayed posttraumatic acute subdural hematoma in elderly patients on anticoagulation
Neurosurgery
Time to deterioration of the elderly, anticoagulated, minor head injury patient who presents without evidence of neurologic abnormality
J Trauma
Reversal of anticoagulation in trauma: a North-American survey on clinical practices among trauma surgeons
J Trauma
Head injury: triage, assessment, investigation and early management of head injury in infants, children, and adults
Defining acute mild head injury in adults: a proposal based on prognostic factors, diagnosis, and management
J Neurotrauma
EFNS guideline on mild traumatic brain injury: report of an EFNS task force
Eur J Neurol
Top 20 global products, 2010, total audited markets
Effects of antiplatelet agents on outcomes for elderly patients with traumatic intracranial hemorrhage
J Trauma
The effects of clopidogrel on elderly traumatic brain injured patients
J Trauma
Cited by (0)
Provide feedback on this article at the journal’s Web site, www.annemergmed.com.
A podcast for this article is available at www.annemergmed.com.
Funding and support: By Annals policy, all authors are required to disclose any and all commercial, financial, and other relationships in any way related to the subject of this article as per ICMJE conflict of interest guidelines (see www.icmje.org). The authors have stated that no such relationships exist. This work was supported by the Garfield Memorial Fund (Kaiser Permanente). Dr. Nishijima was supported through a Mentored Clinical Research Training Program Award (K30 and KL2), grant UL1 RR024146 from the National Center for Research Resources (NCRR), a component of the National Institutes of Health (NIH), and NIH Roadmap for Medical Research. The Garfield Memorial Fund, NCRR, and NIH had no role in the design and conduct of the study, in the analysis or interpretation of the data, or in the preparation of the data.
Please see page 461 for the Editor's Capsule Summary of this article.
Supervising editor: Robert A. De Lorenzo, MD, MSM
Author contributions: DKN had full access to all of the data in the study and takes responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis. DKN, ASR, and JFH conducted the analysis and interpretation of data. All authors contributed to the study conception and design, acquisition of data, drafting and critical revision of the article, obtaining funding, and approval of the final article. DKN takes responsibility for the paper as a whole.
The views expressed in this article are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official view of NCRR, NIH, or Kaiser Permanente. Information on the NCRR is available at http://www.ncrr.nih.gov/. Information on Re-engineering the Clinical Research Enterprise can be obtained from http://nihroadmap.nih.gov/clinicalresearch/overview-translational.asp.