Trauma/original research
Immediate and Delayed Traumatic Intracranial Hemorrhage in Patients With Head Trauma and Preinjury Warfarin or Clopidogrel Use

Presented at the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine national meeting, June 2011, Boston, MA.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annemergmed.2012.04.007Get rights and content

Study objective

Patients receiving warfarin or clopidogrel are considered at increased risk for traumatic intracranial hemorrhage after blunt head trauma. The prevalence of immediate traumatic intracranial hemorrhage and the cumulative incidence of delayed traumatic intracranial hemorrhage in these patients, however, are unknown. The objective of this study is to address these gaps in knowledge.

Methods

A prospective, observational study at 2 trauma centers and 4 community hospitals enrolled emergency department (ED) patients with blunt head trauma and preinjury warfarin or clopidogrel use from April 2009 through January 2011. Patients were followed for 2 weeks. The prevalence of immediate traumatic intracranial hemorrhage and the cumulative incidence of delayed traumatic intracranial hemorrhage were calculated from patients who received initial cranial computed tomography (CT) in the ED. Delayed traumatic intracranial hemorrhage was defined as traumatic intracranial hemorrhage within 2 weeks after an initially normal CT scan result and in the absence of repeated head trauma.

Results

A total of 1,064 patients were enrolled (768 warfarin patients [72.2%] and 296 clopidogrel patients [27.8%]). There were 364 patients (34.2%) from Level I or II trauma centers and 700 patients (65.8%) from community hospitals. One thousand patients received a cranial CT scan in the ED. Both warfarin and clopidogrel groups had similar demographic and clinical characteristics, although concomitant aspirin use was more prevalent among patients receiving clopidogrel. The prevalence of immediate traumatic intracranial hemorrhage was higher in patients receiving clopidogrel (33/276, 12.0%; 95% confidence interval [CI] 8.4% to 16.4%) than patients receiving warfarin (37/724, 5.1%; 95% CI 3.6% to 7.0%), relative risk 2.31 (95% CI 1.48 to 3.63). Delayed traumatic intracranial hemorrhage was identified in 4 of 687 (0.6%; 95% CI 0.2% to 1.5%) patients receiving warfarin and 0 of 243 (0%; 95% CI 0% to 1.5%) patients receiving clopidogrel.

Conclusion

Although there may be unmeasured confounders that limit intergroup comparison, patients receiving clopidogrel have a significantly higher prevalence of immediate traumatic intracranial hemorrhage compared with patients receiving warfarin. Delayed traumatic intracranial hemorrhage is rare and occurred only in patients receiving warfarin. Discharging patients receiving anticoagulant or antiplatelet medications from the ED after a normal cranial CT scan result is reasonable, but appropriate instructions are required because delayed traumatic intracranial hemorrhage may occur.

Introduction

The use of anticoagulant and antiplatelet medications, specifically warfarin and clopidogrel, is steadily increasing.1, 2, 3 Previous studies suggest that patients receiving either of these medications are at increased risk for traumatic intracranial hemorrhage after blunt head trauma, but the risk in a large, generalizable cohort is unknown.4, 5, 6

The majority of patients with traumatic intracranial hemorrhage are identified on initial cranial computed tomographic (CT) scan. Limited data, however, suggest that patients receiving warfarin are at increased risk for delayed traumatic intracranial hemorrhage (traumatic intracranial hemorrhage diagnosed within 2 weeks of injury after an initially normal cranial CT scan result).7, 8, 9 The concern for delayed traumatic intracranial hemorrhage is highlighted by the not uncommon practice of reversing warfarin anticoagulation in patients with head trauma and a normal cranial CT scan result.10 The potential risk for both immediate and delayed traumatic intracranial hemorrhage has generated guidelines recommending routine cranial CT imaging and hospital admission for neurologic observation in head-injured patients receiving warfarin.11, 12, 13, 14 These recommendations, however, are not informed by rigorous, prospective, multicenter studies identifying the prevalence and incidence of immediate traumatic intracranial hemorrhage and delayed traumatic intracranial hemorrhage in patients receiving warfarin.

The evidence supporting an increased risk of traumatic intracranial hemorrhage in patients receiving clopidogrel is more limited,11 despite this drug being one of the most commonly prescribed worldwide.15 Although small retrospective studies suggest an increased risk of traumatic intracranial hemorrhage and mortality in head trauma patients receiving clopidogrel,6, 16, 17 current guidelines do not explicitly recommend routine CT imaging for these patients after blunt head trauma.11, 12, 13 In addition, the risk of delayed traumatic intracranial hemorrhage in patients receiving clopidogrel is entirely unknown.

Knowledge of the true prevalence and incidence of immediate and delayed traumatic intracranial hemorrhage in patients receiving warfarin or clopidogrel would allow clinicians to make evidence-based decisions about their initial patient evaluation and disposition. Therefore, we assessed the prevalence and incidence of immediate and delayed traumatic intracranial hemorrhage in patients with blunt head trauma who were receiving either warfarin or clopidogrel. Warfarin and clopidogrel cohorts were compared. We hypothesized that the prevalence for immediate traumatic intracranial hemorrhage was similar between patients receiving clopidogrel and those receiving warfarin and that the cumulative incidence of delayed traumatic intracranial hemorrhage in both groups was less than 1%.

Section snippets

Study Design

This was a prospective, observational, multicenter study conducted at 2 trauma centers and 4 community hospitals in Northern California. The study was approved by the institutional review boards at all sites.

Setting and Selection of Participants

Adult (aged ≥18 years) emergency department (ED) patients with blunt head trauma and preinjury warfarin or clopidogrel use (within the previous 7 days) were enrolled. We defined blunt head trauma as any blunt head injury regardless of loss of consciousness or amnesia. We excluded patients

Characteristics of Study Subjects

Between April 2009 and January 2011, 1,101 patients were enrolled (83.3% of all eligible patients) (Figure). Comparison of patients enrolled and those eligible but not enrolled demonstrated similar characteristics (age, sex, medication use, ED cranial CT, and hospital admission) and outcomes (immediate traumatic intracranial hemorrhage, neurosurgical intervention, and inhospital mortality). Reasons for failures of the study screening process were unknown. Thirty-seven patients were excluded (25

Limitations

Our results should be interpreted in the context of several limitations. This was an observational study; thus, CT scans were not obtained for all patients and ethical considerations prevented CT scanning solely for study purposes. Some patients not undergoing CT scan during initial ED visit potentially had an undiagnosed traumatic intracranial hemorrhage, although none was identified in follow-up. Furthermore, some patients with a negative initial CT scan result may have eventually developed

Discussion

Contrary to our hypothesis, the prevalence of immediate traumatic intracranial hemorrhage in patients with clopidogrel was significantly higher compared with those receiving warfarin despite the cohorts' having similar characteristics. Additionally, we determined in a large and generalizable cohort of patients receiving warfarin or clopidogrel that the development of a delayed traumatic intracranial hemorrhage after a negative initial cranial CT scan result is rare and does not warrant routine

References (40)

  • D.B. Cohen et al.

    Traumatic brain injury in anticoagulated patients

    J Trauma

    (2006)
  • E. Itshayek et al.

    Delayed posttraumatic acute subdural hematoma in elderly patients on anticoagulation

    Neurosurgery

    (2006)
  • F.D. Reynolds et al.

    Time to deterioration of the elderly, anticoagulated, minor head injury patient who presents without evidence of neurologic abnormality

    J Trauma

    (2003)
  • R. Coimbra et al.

    Reversal of anticoagulation in trauma: a North-American survey on clinical practices among trauma surgeons

    J Trauma

    (2005)
  • Head injury: triage, assessment, investigation and early management of head injury in infants, children, and adults

  • F. Servadei et al.

    Defining acute mild head injury in adults: a proposal based on prognostic factors, diagnosis, and management

    J Neurotrauma

    (2001)
  • P.E. Vos et al.

    EFNS guideline on mild traumatic brain injury: report of an EFNS task force

    Eur J Neurol

    (2002)
  • Top 20 global products, 2010, total audited markets

  • C. Ohm et al.

    Effects of antiplatelet agents on outcomes for elderly patients with traumatic intracranial hemorrhage

    J Trauma

    (2005)
  • D.K. Wong et al.

    The effects of clopidogrel on elderly traumatic brain injured patients

    J Trauma

    (2008)
  • Cited by (0)

    Provide feedback on this article at the journal’s Web site, www.annemergmed.com.

    A podcast for this article is available at www.annemergmed.com.

    Funding and support: By Annals policy, all authors are required to disclose any and all commercial, financial, and other relationships in any way related to the subject of this article as per ICMJE conflict of interest guidelines (see www.icmje.org). The authors have stated that no such relationships exist. This work was supported by the Garfield Memorial Fund (Kaiser Permanente). Dr. Nishijima was supported through a Mentored Clinical Research Training Program Award (K30 and KL2), grant UL1 RR024146 from the National Center for Research Resources (NCRR), a component of the National Institutes of Health (NIH), and NIH Roadmap for Medical Research. The Garfield Memorial Fund, NCRR, and NIH had no role in the design and conduct of the study, in the analysis or interpretation of the data, or in the preparation of the data.

    Please see page 461 for the Editor's Capsule Summary of this article.

    Supervising editor: Robert A. De Lorenzo, MD, MSM

    Author contributions: DKN had full access to all of the data in the study and takes responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis. DKN, ASR, and JFH conducted the analysis and interpretation of data. All authors contributed to the study conception and design, acquisition of data, drafting and critical revision of the article, obtaining funding, and approval of the final article. DKN takes responsibility for the paper as a whole.

    The views expressed in this article are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official view of NCRR, NIH, or Kaiser Permanente. Information on the NCRR is available at http://www.ncrr.nih.gov/. Information on Re-engineering the Clinical Research Enterprise can be obtained from http://nihroadmap.nih.gov/clinicalresearch/overview-translational.asp.

    View full text