AAHKS Symposium: The Future is Here - Bundled Payments and ICD-10Bundled Payments: Our Experience at an Academic Medical Center
Section snippets
Episode of Care
NYULMC Hospital for Joint Diseases (HJD) implemented the model 2 90-day BPCI for total joint arthroplasty MS-DRGs 469 and 470 beginning in January of 2013. Under this alternative payment program, the entirety of a patient’s episode of care is covered by a single bundled payment. CMS defines an episode of care as “all Medicare Part A and Part B services provided by an entity wholly-owned or operated by the admitting hospital in the 72 hours prior to admission, surgeon fees, anesthesiologist
Results
Through the first year of program eligibility, the 2013 fiscal year (FY), 721 patients were successfully integrated into the BPCI program. In the first 2 quarters, we appreciated an 8.1% and 17% savings for DRGs 469 and 470, respectively. Those savings were maintained throughout the 2014 reconciliations. During the baseline 3 years (2009-2012), NYULMC experienced an average length of hospital stay of 5.31, 4.60, and 4.43 days in consecutive years. In the 2013 FY, NYULMC achieved a decrease in
Bundled Payments for Care Improvement
NYULMC HJD has shown that the BPCI model 2 can be successfully implemented at a tertiary care, epidemic, urban medical center with a hybrid compensation model. NYULMC was able to establish an evidenced-based pathway system for patient care and develop the proper infrastructure for it to run efficiently. After 2 years of the program, NYULMC was able to decrease hospital length of stay, decrease discharges to inpatient facilities, and decrease the cost of the episode of care of each patient.
Conclusion
NYULMC has successfully implemented value-based purchasing through the use of the BPCI 2 model. Since January 2013, NYULMC has achieved a significant decrease in patients' length of stay, discharge to inpatient facilities, and cost of the episode of care. NYULMC had not significantly altered readmission rates in the 2013 FY, but during 2014, the readmission rates were decreased because of improved care management and preoperative risk factor optimization. In addition to increased cost
References (9)
Strategies and tactics for successful implementation of bundled payments: bundled payment for care improvement at a large, urban, academic medical center
J Arthroplasty
(2015)- et al.
The effect of discharge disposition on 30-day readmission rates after total joint arthroplasty
J Arthroplasty
(2014) - et al.
Cost burden of 30-day readmissions following Medicare total hip and knee arthroplasty
J Arthroplasty
(2014) - et al.
The effect of severity of disease on cost burden of 30-day readmissions following total joint arthroplasty (TJA)
J Arthroplasty
(2014)
Cited by (39)
Trends in Single-Level Lumbar Fusions Over the Past Decade Using a National Database
2022, World NeurosurgeryPreoperative Risk Factor Screening Protocols in Total Joint Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review
2020, Journal of ArthroplastyAfter the COVID-19 Pandemic: Returning to Normalcy or Returning to a New Normal?
2020, Journal of ArthroplastyDisparities in Hip Arthroplasty Outcomes: Results of a Statewide Hospital Registry From 2016 to 2018
2020, Journal of ArthroplastyWhat Are the Risk Factors for 48 or More–Hour Stay and Nonhome Discharge After Total Knee Arthroplasty? Results From 151 Illinois Hospitals, 2016-2018
2020, Journal of ArthroplastyCitation Excerpt :These trends, the recent CMS inpatient rule, and the recent national push for value-based payment suggest that minority patients and those with comorbid conditions will be more likely to have complicated inpatient stays. They may be more frequently avoided by providers seeking to maximize reimbursement under the new value-based payment environment [8,10], which would ultimately worsen variability in utilization. We found that female sex, older age, non-(non-Hispanic) white race and ethnicity, insurance status, obesity status, higher CCI, and low hospital volume were all independently associated with increased likelihood of eLOS.
The effects of DRGs-based payment compared with cost-based payment on inpatient healthcare utilization: A systematic review and meta-analysis
2020, Health PolicyCitation Excerpt :According to the predefined criteria, we excluded the studies about the Japanese Diagnosis Procedure Combination system (DPC), which was a mixed reimbursement system of part prospective and part cost-based, and had a flat-rate per diem fee based on diagnosis categories [16]. We also excluded the studies about the Chinese Hainan system [17] and Medicare Resource Utilization Groups [18], which were the systems based on a flat-rate for a period of time. We included the study designs approved by the Cochrane Effective Practice and Organisation of Care Group (EPOC): randomised controlled trials (RCTs), non-randomised trials (non-RCTs), controlled before-after (CBA) studies, interrupted time series (ITS) studies and repeated measures studies.
One or more of the authors of this paper have disclosed potential or pertinent conflicts of interest, which may include receipt of payment, either direct or indirect, institutional support, or association with an entity in the biomedical field which may be perceived to have potential conflict of interest with this work. For full disclosure statements refer to http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2016.01.055.
The statements contained in this document are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. The authors assume responsibility for the accuracy and completeness of the information contained in this document.