Elsevier

Annals of Vascular Surgery

Volume 23, Issue 3, May–June 2009, Pages 317-323
Annals of Vascular Surgery

Clinical Research
Clinical Outcome and Quality of Life after Upper Extremity Arterial Trauma

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avsg.2008.05.007Get rights and content

We assessed the long-term clinical outcome of 33 patients treated for arterial trauma of the upper extremity at the Regensburg University Medical Center between 1996 and 2004. Along with clinical parameters, the Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) score and the Short Form-36 Health Survey (SF-36) score of each patient were collected at the time of follow-up. Findings of the clinical assessment were compared to results obtained with the DASH score and the SF-36 questionnaire. The median follow-up time was 42 months. All arterial injuries had been reconstructed and were open at the time of follow-up. The prevalence of concomitant neural and/or orthopedic injuries was high (24/33, 72%). The influence of neural injury was by far greater than the impact of other factors on the long-term functional outcome. Furthermore, blunt trauma and the need for immediate fasciotomy were further markers for deficient functional recovery. Both the DASH and the SF-36 scores correlated with the clinical assessment of the severity of functional deficits. Upper extremity vascular trauma is almost always associated with severe concomitant orthopedic and/or neural injuries. The involvement of the brachial plexus and the peripheral nerves of the upper extremity is a predictor of worse long-term functional outcome.

Introduction

In Europe, traumatic vascular injuries, especially of the extremities, are rare.1, 2 Thus, surgical procedures for vascular injuries make up only 0.3-4% of all reconstructive arterial and venous operations.3, 4 For the patient, arterial injuries are always threatening. On the one hand, major blood loss can occur in a very short period of time. On the other hand, there is the imminent danger of limb loss by prolonged ischemia. Diagnostic and therapeutic strategies have been improved continuously to decrease the time to obtain the correct diagnosis, to control bleeding, and to restore arterial blood flow to the affected extremity.5, 6, 7

Not only the kind of arterial injury and the length of ischemia time but also the extent of the concomitant injuries influence the long-term outcome.8, 9, 10, 11 For injuries of the upper extremitiy, the Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) score is a validated instrument to assess the clinical long-term outcome.12 Clinical experience shows that many patients suffer from long-term functional and social limitations. The traditional outcome measure focuses mostly on objective clinical data. Recently, more attention has been paid to patient-related data to measure the “health-related quality of life” (HRQoL) as a synonym for “medical outcome.” The purpose of these instruments, mostly questionnaires like the Short Form-36 Health Survey (SF-36), is to identify all trauma-related changes in the patient's everyday life. Because of the comprehensive design of the SF-36, it can always be used if a sustained impairment of the HRQoL can be expected as a sequel of diseases or injuries.13, 14, 15 Bullinger and coworkers16 developed and validated a German version of the SF-36. Since then, the German version of the SF-36 has been used for the measurement of HRQoL in many studies.17, 18, 19, 20 Clinical experience with patients suffering arterial injuries at the upper extremity has shown that limitations in different fields of daily life have to be expected. Therefore, the SF-36 questionnaire seems to be an excellent instrument for outcome measurement. To our knowledge, this is the first study analyzing HRQoL after vascular injuries at the upper extremity. SF-36 scores of 33 patients were compared with functional outcome assessment and mean DASH score and correlated with SF-36 scores of a representative healthy German population.21

In this retrospective study, the long-term outcome of patients with arterial injuries of the upper extremity was assessed by the DASH score and the SF-36 questionnaire. The results were correlated with the evaluation of clinical outcome by vascular surgeons.

Section snippets

Patients and Methods

Between January 1, 1996, and September 30, 2004, 54 patients with arterial injuries at the upper extremity were operated at the Regensburg University Medical Center. Patients with iatrogenic injuries or isolated injuries to hand or finger arteries were excluded. The charts of all patients were reviewed. Three patients had died since the operation, and 10 patients could not be contacted because there was no current address or telephone number. Three patients were excluded because they met

Results

Thirty-three of 54 patients with arterial injuries at the upper extremity completed the follow-up of this study. Their data were used for statistical analysis. According to age, gender, mechanism, localization, and characteristics of the injury, there were no statistically significant differences from the group of patients who did not complete follow-up.

Twenty-four patients had arterial injuries at the forearm (radial artery, ulnar artery) and nine at the upper arm (brachial artery, axillary

Discussion

The incidence of upper extremity arterial trauma is low.2, 10, 24, 25, 26, 27 During the study period of 93 months, 54 patients with vascular injuries at the upper extremity were treated at our center. Three patients died, one from severe concomitant injuries during the initial hospital stay and two for non-trauma-associated reasons during follow-up. One patient had to be amputated, and he was excluded from the analysis. Thirty-three patients (63%) could be contacted for follow-up (Fig. 1).

Conclusion

Upper extremity vascular trauma is almost always associated with severe concomitant orthopedic and/or neural injuries. Therefore, an interdisciplinary approach is essential for treatment. Obviously, the involvement of the brachial plexus and the peripheral nerves of the upper extremity is a predictor of worse long-term functional outcome. Blunt trauma and the need for immediate fasciotomy are further markers for deficient functional recovery. The DASH and SF-36 are helpful instruments to

References (42)

Cited by (14)

  • Outcomes of digital artery revascularization in pediatric trauma

    2016, Journal of Pediatric Surgery
    Citation Excerpt :

    This is consistent with low rates of amputation in other studies involving noniatrogenic traumatic digital injury [1,2,15,16]. Therapeutic hand fasciotomy was only required in one patient secondarily to compartment syndrome and was associated with decreased functional recovery, consistent with other reports [17,18]. The most serious complaints at follow-up, excluding the two patients who required amputation of one or more digits, were decreased sensation and impaired function.

  • Long-term Clinical Outcome and Functional Status after Arterial Reconstruction in Upper Extremity Injury

    2016, European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery
    Citation Excerpt :

    In the present series, patient surveillance included repeated duplex ultrasound follow up at 3–5 year intervals and two occlusions and two stenoses were detected. The long-term patency rate is 97%, which is slightly lower than the rates of 99–100% given by others.1,2,6 Of note, those studies do not mention their surveillance programs, whether they included duplex studies, or whether they were based purely on clinical tests.

  • Approach to mutilating hand injuries

    2019, Journal of Clinical Orthopaedics and Trauma
View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text