Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Latest content
    • Latest content
  • Archive
  • About the journal
    • About the journal
    • Editorial board
    • Information for authors
    • FAQs
    • Thank you to our reviewers
    • The American Association for the Surgery of Trauma
  • Submit a paper
    • Online submission site
    • Information for authors
  • Email alerts
    • Email alerts
  • Help
    • Contact us
    • Feedback form
    • Reprints
    • Permissions
    • Advertising
  • BMJ Journals

User menu

  • Login

Search

  • Advanced search
  • BMJ Journals
  • Login
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
TSACO

Advanced Search

  • Latest content
    • Latest content
  • Archive
  • About the journal
    • About the journal
    • Editorial board
    • Information for authors
    • FAQs
    • Thank you to our reviewers
    • The American Association for the Surgery of Trauma
  • Submit a paper
    • Online submission site
    • Information for authors
  • Email alerts
    • Email alerts
  • Help
    • Contact us
    • Feedback form
    • Reprints
    • Permissions
    • Advertising
Open Access

Creation and implementation of a novel clinical workflow based on the AAST uniform anatomic severity grading system for emergency general surgery conditions

Kovi E Bessoff, Jeff Choi, Sylvia Bereknyei Merrell, Aussama Khalaf Nassar, David Spain, Lisa Marie Knowlton
DOI: 10.1136/tsaco-2020-000552 Published 8 September 2020
Kovi E Bessoff
1General Surgery, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA
2Students and Surgeons writing About Trauma, Department of Surgery, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Kovi E Bessoff
Jeff Choi
1General Surgery, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA
2Students and Surgeons writing About Trauma, Department of Surgery, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Jeff Choi
Sylvia Bereknyei Merrell
3Department of Surgery, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Aussama Khalaf Nassar
2Students and Surgeons writing About Trauma, Department of Surgery, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
4Section of Acute Care Surgery, Department of Surgery, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
David Spain
2Students and Surgeons writing About Trauma, Department of Surgery, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
3Department of Surgery, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Lisa Marie Knowlton
1General Surgery, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA
2Students and Surgeons writing About Trauma, Department of Surgery, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Supplementary Materials
  • Figure 1
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1

    Schematic of the current acute care surgery clinical workflow. Gray boxes introduce hypothesized improvements as a result of proposed interventions derived from integration of the AAST EGS grading system. AAST, American Association for the Surgery of Trauma; EGS, emergency general surgery; QI, quality improvement.

  • Figure 2
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 2

    Barriers to implementation of the AAST EGS grades-integrated workflow identified through qualitative interviews. Obstacles are divided by theme with brief summaries of each perceived obstacle. Quotations illustrate participants’ sentiments toward these issues. Blue boxes outline potential solutions to overcome the aforementioned barriers. AAST, American Association for the Surgery of Trauma; EGS, emergency general surgery.

  • Figure 3
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 3

    Best practices to maximize educational endeavors to promote familiarity with an AAST EGS grades-based workflow. Illustrative quotations from interviewees are provided for each. AAST, American Association for the Surgery of Trauma; EGS, emergency general surgery.

Tables

  • Figures
  • Supplementary Materials
  • Table 1

    Point-of-care data extraction of patients presenting with emergency general surgery (EGS) conditions between July 30, 2018 and November 18, 2019 using the H&P documentation template

    EGS conditionPatient encounters (n)
    Acute appendicitis370
    Peptic ulcer disease27
    Bowel ischemia13
    Small bowel obstruction403
    Colitis234
    Acute diverticulitis274
    Breast infections329
    Acute cholecystitis384
    Acute pancreatitis172
    Soft tissue infections2
    Hernias28
    Perirectal abscesses55
    • H&P, history and physical.

  • Table 2

    Respondents' quotes illustrating the potential of the EGS uniform anatomic severity grading system-based workflow to provide novel opportunities for standardization in care, clinical research, and overall improved patient care

    ThemeQuotation
    Standardization‘The standardization of consult notes is really appealing. Having information that you should always include for common consults, and be able to compare across consults. I think that would be very useful.’
    ‘I think that any time appropriate Standardization occurs, then that decreases the potential for human error.’
    ‘If this synoptic note and scoring system is validated, it would be really important to have and to use for institutional transfer. You get these calls from community hospitals and you don't have an idea of how acute the patient is. You try to ask enough questions, but then the patients show up here [in a different condition than expected]. I think this being implemented beyond Stanford in general surgery could be really helpful.’
    Facilitate clinical research‘I think it will simplify categorization of patients for research rather than having to sift through dozens of charts later on.’
    ‘I would say probably trying to get better data on some of the questions regarding decision making in general surgery. In non-operative management, there are a lot of challenging situations that we make decisions on based on our best judgment and/or discussion with other physicians, but there is little good data to go off. The numbers are small or non-existent. So I think that would be the most useful part.’
    ‘Yes, in terms of the guiding data, it is important to know. Because a lot of the patients are probably managed non-operatively and are being missed as important.’
    ‘I think you would get lots of good data about the consults we're seeing, how acute they are, how much we're operating, and what we're doing. I think it is a good way to collect data and organize it in an area that would be otherwise hard to follow.’
    ‘Where I see value in it is in research. I think it’s similar to organ injury grading for trauma, where at the time of initial evaluation and management, I would say it isn’t particularly useful. I think it is more useful in the backend when it comes to research and classification for studies.’
    Improve care‘I think this is happening in different areas of medicine. Cancer is one example where staging is applied formally. I think it allows you to provide better quality care and to interpret other institutions' information.’
    ‘This helps us understand our outcomes. I think that’s motivating for everyone, because everyone wants to help take better of patients and be able to have metrics to know that we’re doing that.’
    ‘I think for the first time it will help to really not only classify the types of patients that come to an emergency general surgery service, but it also helps in terms of understanding trends in their care and how we can provide more efficient service to the patients.’
    • EGS, emergency general surgery.

  • Table 3

    Respondents’ opinions regarding the use of management guidelines

    Benefits of management guidelinesReservations around management guidelines
    ‘It was really helpful to be able to match the clinical picture I was seeing up to something that was in the consult handbook and then feel comfortable that I making the right management decision for the patient.’‘There’s a reason why many physicians don’t adhere to [protocols], because they don’t believe that they apply to the patient population that they're taking care of.’
    ‘The consult handbook was especially nice because it was concise, focused on the things we see most often, and I could feel comfortable knowing that I had appropriately assessed the patient and placed them into one of the buckets and that my management decision was going to be in the realm of it was reasonable to treat the patient. It was nice to have that reassurance.’‘I think it is possible [to protocolize treatment], but I think it’s never that clean. We just need to find out what emergency cases fit into which category… I think in some ways it’s comparable to injury grading and how we use that, but we may find out it’s not. We don’t really have any data.’
    ‘The consult handbook was great, especially starting out, to really guide what to do in these situations and give you the resource quickly make a diagnosis and know “these are the things I need to think about.” It’s not just take them to the OR. It’s also remember to start antibiotics, start fluids, and these ancillary details might get lost in all the focus of “this patient has got to go to the OR”.’‘I think for straightforward things it’s probably a good idea. Like for proven appendicitis or cholecystitis. But, I think for other kinds of emergency general surgery consults, like perforated viscus, you have no idea if its upper GI or lower GI. Perhaps the pathway for those scenarios is probably not the best thing and might lead people to the wrong route.’
    ‘I think with any grading or classification system, it provides a rubric and a starting point with suggested management based on disease severity, but you’re not obligated to do that regardless of what your team ends up doing, it provides a baseline, agreed upon management and I think that is only going to be helpful.’‘There are definitely times when the patient falls in between 2 different classes, but you’re supposed to use your clinical judgment to be able to determine what their treatment is. That’s the fault of any classification system. Sometimes there is gray. It’s not always black and white.’
    ‘Having a classification system with a clear outline on what management steps we take, what tests to order, what studies to be done. I think that lets us make sure we don't miss any important workups or plans.’‘I mean the residents may use that, but I don’t think the faculty member is going to pull up a handbook. They’re just not, it doesn’t fit the workflow.’
    ‘I think that with the diagnostic information being brought in through the EGS classification system, it’s going to really stratify branch points and management based on classification systems of these typical emergency general surgery problems.’‘Sometimes I feel like there is almost a discrepancy between what my assessment and plan is as compared to the a few words that are in the classification itself. I think sometimes there’s a little bit of a disconnect there. Sometimes I would think to myself “is it ok to say other or select this criteria even if its not 100% applicable to the patient in one way but it is in another?”’
    ‘It makes it much more black and white in terms of how to communicate about the patient. I also provides a little bit of a checklist in the middles of the night when you're tired to make sure you don't forget anything.’‘I think you’re going to run into the same problem where you have now a second layer of “how do I interpret these guidelines?” I’m not sure how much it will be helpful, because the decision making process in always complicated no matter what. Patients are not that straightforward and they may not fit into certain guidelines. If the guidelines are written very carefully with definite hard points where there is certain criteria where for like 95% certainty this next step should happen, then I think it would be useful.’

Supplementary Materials

  • Figures
  • Tables
  • Supplementary data

    [tsaco-2020-000552supp001.pdf]

  • Supplementary data

    [tsaco-2020-000552supp002.pdf]

PreviousNext
Back to top
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on TSACO.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Creation and implementation of a novel clinical workflow based on the AAST uniform anatomic severity grading system for emergency general surgery conditions
(Your Name) has sent you a message from TSACO
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the TSACO web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Citation Tools
Creation and implementation of a novel clinical workflow based on the AAST uniform anatomic severity grading system for emergency general surgery conditions
Kovi E Bessoff, Jeff Choi, Sylvia Bereknyei Merrell, Aussama Khalaf Nassar, David Spain, Lisa Marie Knowlton
Trauma Surg Acute Care Open Sep 2020, 5 (1) e000552; DOI: 10.1136/tsaco-2020-000552

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Cite This
  • APA
  • Chicago
  • Endnote
  • MLA
Loading
Creation and implementation of a novel clinical workflow based on the AAST uniform anatomic severity grading system for emergency general surgery conditions
Kovi E Bessoff, Jeff Choi, Sylvia Bereknyei Merrell, Aussama Khalaf Nassar, David Spain, Lisa Marie Knowlton
Trauma Surg Acute Care Open Sep 2020, 5 (1) e000552; DOI: 10.1136/tsaco-2020-000552
Download PDF

Share
Creation and implementation of a novel clinical workflow based on the AAST uniform anatomic severity grading system for emergency general surgery conditions
Kovi E Bessoff, Jeff Choi, Sylvia Bereknyei Merrell, Aussama Khalaf Nassar, David Spain, Lisa Marie Knowlton
Trauma Surgery & Acute Care Open Sep 2020, 5 (1) e000552; DOI: 10.1136/tsaco-2020-000552
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
Respond to this article
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Background
    • Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Conclusion
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • Building trauma capability: using geospatial analysis to consider military treatment facilities for trauma center development
  • A decade of hospital costs for firearm injuries in the United States by region, 2005–2015: government healthcare costs and firearm policies
  • Variability in opioid pain medication prescribing for adolescent trauma patients in a sample of US pediatric trauma centers
Show more Original research

Similar Articles

 
 

CONTENT

  • Latest content
  • Archive
  • eLetters
  • Sign up for email alerts
  • RSS

JOURNAL

  • About the journal
  • Editorial board
  • Thank you to our reviewers
  • The American Association for the Surgery of Trauma

AUTHORS

  • Information for authors
  • Submit a paper
  • Track your article
  • Open Access at BMJ

HELP

  • Contact us
  • Reprints
  • Permissions
  • Advertising
  • Feedback form

©Copyright 2022 The American Association for the Surgery of Trauma