Open Access
Contemporary hemodynamic monitoring, fluid responsiveness, volume optimization, and endpoints of resuscitation: an AAST critical care committee clinical consensus
Niels D Martin, Panna Codner, Wendy Greene, Karen Brasel, Christopher Michetti
DOI: 10.1136/tsaco-2019-000411 Published 10 March 2020
Niels D Martin
1Department of Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
Panna Codner
2Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA
Wendy Greene
3Department of Surgery, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
Karen Brasel
4Department of Surgery, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA
Christopher Michetti
5Department of Surgery, Inova Fairfax Medical Center, Falls Church, Virginia, USA
Submit a Response to This Article
No eLetters have been published for this article.
Contemporary hemodynamic monitoring, fluid responsiveness, volume optimization, and endpoints of resuscitation: an AAST critical care committee clinical consensus
Niels D Martin, Panna Codner, Wendy Greene, Karen Brasel, Christopher Michetti
Trauma Surg Acute Care Open Mar 2020, 5 (1) e000411; DOI: 10.1136/tsaco-2019-000411
Contemporary hemodynamic monitoring, fluid responsiveness, volume optimization, and endpoints of resuscitation: an AAST critical care committee clinical consensus
Niels D Martin, Panna Codner, Wendy Greene, Karen Brasel, Christopher Michetti
Trauma Surg Acute Care Open Mar 2020, 5 (1) e000411; DOI: 10.1136/tsaco-2019-000411
Contemporary hemodynamic monitoring, fluid responsiveness, volume optimization, and endpoints of resuscitation: an AAST critical care committee clinical consensus
Niels D Martin, Panna Codner, Wendy Greene, Karen Brasel, Christopher Michetti
Trauma Surgery & Acute Care Open Mar 2020, 5 (1) e000411; DOI: 10.1136/tsaco-2019-000411